data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fba74/fba748775923f02bea4b5014b4aaeac4872d5a9e" alt=""
As it was meant to be, in Edward Fallis' original design. The spires were never built.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca95b/ca95bec92b6d03b300196de6d9ec543f545821d0" alt=""
As it was, before the fire of 1920.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87496/874962faa9fb966a16a9f4625781a499e0ecdb03" alt=""
As it was meant to be, in Joseph Huber's post-fire plan. Notice the statues over the doors.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa477/aa4772954b3ffa4f9708817accc800c4d396fe9d" alt=""
And as it is, with the final reworking of the towers, by Willfred Holtzmann.
2 comments:
Why were the towers built differently? It's an intriguing point. I don't think it looks at all bad.
An affectation, you might say. A lot of European churches have two different towers ( Chartres, for example. ) because they were built at different times. The few American churches to do it just imitated the idea. Msgr. Sawkins was responsible for it.
Post a Comment